Radical Lace & Subversive Knitting

Categorized As:

I hope I can make it to this exhibit at the Museum of Arts & Design in New York. It's on through 17 June, so I might just be able to get there. Regardless, I've enjoyed reading about it. The Yarn Market News blog linked to a NY Times review of the exhibit, and I disagree that the review is condescending. I didn't catch even a hint of irony in it. It's just not a glowing review, and the reasons for that are responsible and well presented. I suppose there are two different ways one could interpret “radical lace and subversive knitting.” One is the way the reviewer does, which is in the context of society and the circumvention of societal norms. In this sense, according to what I've read about the exhibit, perhaps it's not terribly radical nor subversive. Maybe the curator interpreted it another way, and circumvented lace and needlework norms specifically, by picking pieces that use unusual materials, tools, or modes of presentation. Unfortunately, the latter interpretation may be lost on a general public that's not as familiar with the norms of lace and needlework as are its practitioners. I'm interested by this concept, though I admit I find societal radicalism and subversion more compelling, overall, simply due to my love of greater contexts and the drama of it all. I'll just have to make sure I can get to the exhibit so I can really form an opinion about it.

If you've seen the exhibit, what do you think? Did you enjoy it? Did you learn something? Were you moved?


Technorati Tags: ,

I went last week and thought it was wonderful. I imagine the NYT reviewer looked at the title of the exhibit and attached her own interpretation of what it means before seeing the exhibit, and couldn't shake it. Because there are several installations that I think subvert the traditional definitions and contexts of fiber-oriented crafts, which I believe in turn make us question the social contexts and gender rules, which are extremely political and politicized. But that's a half-baked theory right now. If someone wants to pay me to write an academic piece on it, I'm open to bids.

Submitted by Michelle (not verified) on 30 January 2007 - 1:11pm.

I'm planning to go see it next weekend hopefully. The author does harp on the title a bit, and rightly so--you'd have to do something completely absurd, insane, or offensive to be labeled as "subversive" or "radical" now--like Borat/Chapelle's racially subversive humor or the flap over the Saatchi (sp?) exhibit with the virgin mary covered in elephant dung. Crocheting shovel heads, though a really cool idea, doesn't qualify for the term. I'm excited to see how artists have bridged the gap between craft and art (or where's the gap? is there a gap? does something have to have no practical purpose to be art and not craft? not sure about it all).

Submitted by marykate (not verified) on 30 January 2007 - 4:00pm.

User login

Get Our eNewsletter

Lots of tips and techniques to help you learn even more about crochet ... and it's FREE!
Enter your email address: